Neuro-fuzzy knowledge processing in intelligent learning environments for improved student diagnosis

In this paper, a neural network implementation for a fuzzy logic-based model of the diagnostic process is proposed as a means to achieve accurate student diagnosis and updates of the student model in Intelligent Learning Environments. The neuro-fuzzy synergy allows the diagnostic model to some extent "imitate" teachers in diagnosing students' characteristics, and equips the intelligent learning environment with reasoning capabilities that can be further used to drive pedagogical decisions depending on the student learning style. The neuro-fuzzy implementation helps to encode both structured and non-structured teachers' knowledge: when teachers' reasoning is available and well defined, it can be encoded in the form of fuzzy rules; when teachers' reasoning is not well defined but is available through practical examples illustrating their experience, then the networks can be trained to represent this experience. The proposed approach has been tested in diagnosing aspects of student's learning style in a discovery-learning environment that aims to help students to construct the concepts of vectors in physics and mathematics. The diagnosis outcomes of the model have been compared against the recommendations of a group of five experienced teachers, and the results produced by two alternative soft computing methods. The results of our pilot study show that the neuro-fuzzy model successfully manages the inherent uncertainty of the diagnostic process; especially for marginal cases, i.e. where it is very difficult, even for human tutors, to diagnose and accurately evaluate students by directly synthesizing subjective and, some times, conflicting judgments

Blocking T cell co-stimulation in primary Sjögren's syndrome:rationale, clinical efficacy and modulation of peripheral and salivary gland biomarkers

There is accumulating evidence that patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) display aberrant CD4+ T cell responses, both in the peripheral compartment and in the inflamed salivary glands. CD4+ T cell abnormalities are also critically associated with B cell hyper activation, one of the hallmarks of disease, which is linked with disease severity and evolution to lymphoma. T cell activation and the cross-talk between T and B cells are tightly regulated by the balance between co-stimulatory pathways, such as the interactions between CD80/CD86:CD28, CD40:CD40L and ICOS:ICOSL, and co-inhibitory signals, including the immunoregulatory CTLA-4 protein. Evidence from patients with pSS as well as data from animal models of the disease suggests that these pathways play a critical role in pSS pathogenesis and their targeting could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. In this review, we first summarise the evidence implicating aberrant T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition in driving the disease before focusing on the results of recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with compounds able to block T cell co-stimulation and enhance T cell co-inhibition. Despite a clear biological effect on downstream B cell activation has been observed in patients treated with CTLA-4-Ig (abatacept) and with monoclonal antibodies targeting CD40 and ICOSL, the clinical efficacy of this approach has so far yielded mixed results; while the anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody iscalimab showed significant improvement in systemic disease activity compared to placebo, two large RCTs with abatacept and a phase IIa RCT with an anti-ICOSL monoclonal antibody (prezalumab) failed to reach their primary endpoints. Although the discrepancies between biological and clinical efficacy of targeting T cell co-stimulation on pSS remain unresolved, several factors including drug bioavailability and receptor occupancy, patient stratification based on T-cell related biomarkers and the choice of study outcome are likely to play an important role and form the basis for further work towards the quest for a disease-modifying biologic therapy in pSS

Blocking T cell co-stimulation in primary Sjögren's syndrome:rationale, clinical efficacy and modulation of peripheral and salivary gland biomarkers

There is accumulating evidence that patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) display aberrant CD4+ T cell responses, both in the peripheral compartment and in the inflamed salivary glands. CD4+ T cell abnormalities are also critically associated with B cell hyper activation, one of the hallmarks of disease, which is linked with disease severity and evolution to lymphoma. T cell activation and the cross-talk between T and B cells are tightly regulated by the balance between co-stimulatory pathways, such as the interactions between CD80/CD86:CD28, CD40:CD40L and ICOS:ICOSL, and co-inhibitory signals, including the immunoregulatory CTLA-4 protein. Evidence from patients with pSS as well as data from animal models of the disease suggests that these pathways play a critical role in pSS pathogenesis and their targeting could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. In this review, we first summarise the evidence implicating aberrant T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition in driving the disease before focusing on the results of recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with compounds able to block T cell co-stimulation and enhance T cell co-inhibition. Despite a clear biological effect on downstream B cell activation has been observed in patients treated with CTLA-4-Ig (abatacept) and with monoclonal antibodies targeting CD40 and ICOSL, the clinical efficacy of this approach has so far yielded mixed results; while the anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody iscalimab showed significant improvement in systemic disease activity compared to placebo, two large RCTs with abatacept and a phase IIa RCT with an anti-ICOSL monoclonal antibody (prezalumab) failed to reach their primary endpoints. Although the discrepancies between biological and clinical efficacy of targeting T cell co-stimulation on pSS remain unresolved, several factors including drug bioavailability and receptor occupancy, patient stratification based on T-cell related biomarkers and the choice of study outcome are likely to play an important role and form the basis for further work towards the quest for a disease-modifying biologic therapy in pSS

Measurement of C1-Inhibitor function alone is sufficient for diagnosis of hereditary angioedema

The World Allergy Organisiation/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (WAO/EAACI) 2017/2018 guidelines recommend measuring complement4 levels, followed by C1-inhibitor level and function for diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE). We analysed 6 months’ worth of data generated in our laboratory which is a specialist regional immunology service and also provides laboratory service for the Barts Health immunology department, which is a GA2LEN/HAEi-Angioedema Centre of Excellence and Reference (ACARE) and hence, investigates a large number of patients for HAE. We found that an efficient and sensitive approach for laboratory diagnosis of HAE is to only test the C1-inhibitor function. This approach had a sensitivity of 100% and reduced the cost of laboratory investigations for HAE diagnosis by 45%

Primary vs. Secondary Antibody Deficiency: Clinical Features and Infection Outcomes of Immunoglobulin Replacement

<div><p>Secondary antibody deficiency can occur as a result of haematological malignancies or certain medications, but not much is known about the clinical and immunological features of this group of patients as a whole. Here we describe a cohort of 167 patients with primary or secondary antibody deficiencies on immunoglobulin (Ig)-replacement treatment. The demographics, causes of immunodeficiency, diagnostic delay, clinical and laboratory features, and infection frequency were analysed retrospectively. Chemotherapy for B cell lymphoma and the use of Rituximab, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive medications were the most common causes of secondary antibody deficiency in this cohort. There was no difference in diagnostic delay or bronchiectasis between primary and secondary antibody deficiency patients, and both groups experienced disorders associated with immune dysregulation. Secondary antibody deficiency patients had similar baseline levels of serum IgG, but higher IgM and IgA, and a higher frequency of switched memory B cells than primary antibody deficiency patients. Serious and non-serious infections before and after Ig-replacement were also compared in both groups. Although secondary antibody deficiency patients had more serious infections before initiation of Ig-replacement, treatment resulted in a significant reduction of serious and non-serious infections in both primary and secondary antibody deficiency patients. Patients with secondary antibody deficiency experience similar delays in diagnosis as primary antibody deficiency patients and can also benefit from immunoglobulin-replacement treatment.</p></div

Real-world outcomes in hereditary angioedema: first experience from the Icatibant Outcome Survey in the United Kingdom

Background Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a potentially life-threatening, bradykinin-mediated disease, often misdiagnosed and under-treated, with long diagnostic delays. There are limited real-world data on best-practice management of HAE in the UK. Objectives To characterize the clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with HAE type I and II from three specialist centres in the UK using data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; Shire, Zug, Switzerland), an international observational study monitoring safety and effectiveness of icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist. Methods We performed retrospective analyses of IOS data for patients with HAE type I and II from three centres in the UK and compared UK data with pooled IOS data from 10 countries (48 centres). Results Analyses included 73 UK and 579 non-UK patients with HAE type I or II. Median diagnostic delay was 6.2 and 5.9 years, respectively. Analysis of data collected from February 2008 to July 2016 included 286 icatibant-treated attacks in 58 UK patients and 2553 icatibant-treated attacks in 436 non-UK patients (median of 3.0 attacks per patient in both groups). More attacks were treated by icatibant self-administration in UK patients (95.8%) than in non-UK patients (86.8%, p < 0.001). Time to icatibant treatment, time to resolution and attack duration were not significantly different in the UK versus non-UK patients. Conclusion UK patients from the specialist centres studied report similar diagnostic delay and similar icatibant treatment outcomes to their non-UK counterparts. However, improvements in the timely diagnosis of HAE are still required